What is their body of work?
What is their body of work?
When I saw Mansfield on our schedule, I thought, WOW, I didn't know there was a university/college in Mansfield. Turns out there is, but it is Mansfield, PA, located in north central PA and not near anything. It is 36 miles from Elmira NY and 430-some miles from BG.
It is a public university with 1,600 students. They compete in Division II and are known as the Mountaineers or Mounties. Former Detroit Tiger Tom Brookens went there. All-American basketball player Tom McMillan was from there, played at Maryland, later a Congressman. They hosted the first night football game, in 1892, as a publicity student for Edison Illuminating.
They were 5-23 last year and before that 6-21, 4-24, 7-19 and 11-15. They were picked to finish last (9th) in the East Division of their conference, PSAC.
As far as I can tell, their last D1 opponent was Duquesne in 2016 and they lost by 5.
Their coach is John Szentesy, an alum in his 5th year.
Like every other team in the world, they have 8 newcomers. They have two brothers (the Ali brothers) one of whom was Class AAA player of the year in PA last year. (That's the 4th largest in a six-classification system).
This is BG's last game before Air Force comes to town on Monday.
UCLA--(7-1) Smoked Stanford
EKU--(5-3) The indomitable Colonels beat SEMO (Nice win).
Marshall--(4-4) The "could win out" Herd lost to Coastal Carolina
Mississippi State--(5-3) IDLE
Akron--(1-8) Lost to Miami
Buffalo--(5-3) Off
Miami--(4-5) Beat Akron
CMU--(2-6) Off
WMU--(3-5) Off
KSU--(3-5) Off
UT--(6-3) Beat EMU
OU--(6-3) Off
East Vs. West: East 5, West 3
MAC vs P5: 2-19
MAC vs. G5: 6-9
MAC vs FCS: 10-2
MBB started off its season last night with a charity exhibition game in Morgantown with West Virginia. On the pre-season kenpom, WVU is ranked #73 in the country, which would make them the highest ranked team in the MAC. They beat BG by 16 in front of over 9,000 people.
Not sure there was anything too surprising in the outcome. WVU was up 5 with 10 minutes gone, didn't crack a 10-point lead until there were 5 left in the half and it was a 10-point lead at halftime.
Three minutes into the second half, BG had the lead down to 6, but a 9-0 run for the Mountaineers made that a moot point and BG never got closer than 9 the rest of the way.
Nobody shot well, but BG shot worse. Also, the Falcons had 20 TOs over 8 assists. (WVU plays a pressure defense and was #20 in the nation last year in forcing turnovers).
To me, the most interesting thing is who started and who played for how long.
BG went with an 8-main rotation. We ran a much deeper rotation most of last year as we attempted to find time for our many transfers. The only real surprise to me was that Mills only played 7 minutes.
So, within the rotation of 8, we had Agree and O'Neal in the front court, with Metheny at the point and Curtis and Agee at the other guard positions. I was surprised to see O'Neal start, but I guess we felt that with Turner or Towns we would be a little light in the blocks. O'Neal rarely played more than 10 minutes in MAC play last year, even after Reece was dismissed, and didn't play at all in the last 2 games.
Willie Lightfoot is a FR that they really like, so it will be fun watching him develop and contribute.
Neither Felt nor McCloud McComb played at all. It wouldn't have impacted any redshirt for them to play, so I am not sure what is going on. Felt did seem to be walking gingerly at the scrimmage and McCloud played in the scrimmage.
Mansfield (the one in PA) will be in Tuesday for more exciting exhibition action.
MBB will start tomorrow with an exhibition game in Morgantown, WV.
When we last saw our team, things were not good at all. We were coming off three straight winning seasons in forever. Yes, we had lost Justin Turner, but we had Plowden, Fields and Diggs back and some promising transfers and were picked 6th in the MAC.
Things did not turn out like that.
At all.
We started with a kenpom of 139. We finished with a kenpom of 284, our lowest ranking since at least 1997, when kenpom started. That's worse than the last Dakich years, the Orr years or the post-Jans years.
To begin with, BG's starting guards were supposed to be Matheny and Fields, and both of them missed all or most of the season.
Later in the year, Myron Gordon and Joe Reece were dismissed from the team.
In the meantime, BG played the worst defense it has played since at least 1997. They were #343 in the nation in defense, out of 357. They were poor on almost all defensive metrics in the MAC.
BG went 2-9 in their last 11 games. The last 6 losses were by 16, 27, 9, 14, 9 and 40 points. The last one was to UT, so it stung the Falcon faithful especially hard.
BG did not qualify for the MAC tournament. This in a year when the MAC was the #20 ranked conference....normally they are around 13.
The natives are restless, to be sure.
And you can understand that.
So, looking toward this year.
First, Diggs, Plowden and Matiss were out of eligibility. Caleb Fields, Cam Young and Josiah Fulcher transferred.
BGSU returns the following players, of whom (as far as we know) 6 are on scholarship. In addition, Etim did not see action this year.
So Derek van der Merwe will be the new AD at BG. He had the presser today, I think everyone will agree that he won the presser but now the real work begins. So did the last two.
He checks a lot of the boxes I think you want.
I think everyone's consensus is that the next AD needed to be someone special and a little transformational. With the challenges we face, an ordinary look-at-my-resume, easy-hire drone isn't going to move the needle the way people expect. As always, time will tell.
David Briggs asked Dr. Rogers what I believe is the key question. Will BG increase it's financial commitment to athletics? Dr. Rogers didn't answer yes or no, indicated BG's relatively strong institutional financial position and used a lot of buzzwords. I believe a content translation would be "yes but I don't want to set any expectations yet." I have heard that BG is preparing to do just that. I don't think money is all you need, but if you are severely underfunded you are always trying to be Carl Lewis and most times you won't be.
I don't understand why no one asks him when he will start. He said he was going to live in "this community" and time will also tell if he means Perrysburg.
So, day one looks good. Wishing him good luck and success.
Update: From the comments, someone noted that he is the Director of Athletics and Recreation and asked whether that was too much for a guy trying to be the AD. It certainly is not unheard of at BG. During COVID, Moosbrugger was named Director of Athletics, Recreation and Wellness. Ron Zwerlein was Director of Athletics and Recreational Sports.
UCLA--(6-1) Clocked by Oregon in Chipenfreude game.
EKU--(4-3) The indomitable Colonels beat 1-6 North Alabama 56-53
Marshall--(4-3) The "could win out" Herd got a nice win @James Madison
Mississippi State--(5-3) Lost to Bama
Akron--(1-7) Lost Wagon Wheel to Kent by 6
Buffalo--(5-3) Shocked UT with 24 4th Q points
Miami--(3-5) Lost to WMU
CMU--(2-6) We played them
WMU--(3-5) Beat Miami
KSU--(3-5) Beat Akron
UT--(5-3) Lost to UB
OU--(6-3) Beat NIU
East Vs. West: East 5, West 3
MAC vs P5: 2-19
MAC vs. G5: 6-9
MAC vs FCS: 10-2
Look away.... |
What is their body of work?
UCLA--(6-0) Was off. Big game with Oregon next week
EKU--(3-3) The indomitable Colonels lost to Sam Houston
Marshall--(3-3) The "could win out" Herd lost to Louisiana. No FBS wins since leaving South Bend
Mississippi State--(5-2) Lost @UK
Akron--(1-6) Lost to CMU
Buffalo--(4-3) Beat UMass
Miami--(3-4) We played them
CMU--(2-5) Beat Akron
WMU--(2-5) Lost to OU
KSU--(2-5) Lost to UT
UT--(5-2) Beat Kent
OU--(5-3) Beat WMU
East Vs. West: East 2, West 2
MAC vs P5: 2-19
MAC vs. G5: 6-9
MAC vs FCS: 10-2
Sweet victory indeed. #3. We have won 3 of our last 5, including one P5 game (in other words, 3 of 4 in non-P5). It is our best period since Jinks won the last three games of his first season, against the wounded dregs of the MAC East. And our best start in 7 years.
Are we where we want to be? No. Are we where we should be? Everyone has an idea on that. Are we making progress? Yes.
Also, it broke a three-game losing streak to Miami.
Miami was picked to win the East by Phil Steele. They came into the season 21-8 in their last MAC games. Yes, that was all predicated on a different quarterback. This was still the set-up that won @Northwestern and beat Kent. They have beaten people.
I don't know how to say this, but it was a normal football game....and the first we have won like that in a long time.
Credit to our players for their resilience. Coach said that he went "bonkers" on Wednesday with the lack of energy or encouragement among the players. There was a player meeting on Thursday and Friday Coach's wife attended practice and she said it reminded her of a practice at Florida when Loeffler coached there under Urban.
If true, I'm glad we reinforced the behavior with a win.
Anyway, I think resilience is the most important life skill you can have. I don't care who you are, you are going to need it and if you have ambition or goals you are going to need more of it. Our guys could have walked away but they did not.
I thought there were three keys to winning the game.
It started with the defense. Miami is not a strong offensive team. They came in 11th in scoring and 9th in yards per play. BG did what they should do with a poor opponent...they shut them down. Plenty of times in the last 7 years we have made poor offensive teams look like the Ramblin' Wreck.
This did not happen. Miami made 10 first downs and had only 189 yards of total offense. It was our best tackling game since....well....Miami last year and in the range of the tackling in the Minnesota win (from PFF). Also from PFF, our best overall defensive effort since the Marshall game.
Smith had 91 passing yards against 23 sack yards and a strip sack. Yes, he beat us for some runs but the Miami backs had 2.2 yards per carry.
In the second half, Miami had 3 first downs. Their longest second half drive was 33 yards, with 26 yards on one play.
The next key was the offense. Look, the offense has a lot of room for improvement. Notably, this red zone offense is painful to watch. BG was 3-6 in the red zone, really 3 of 5, because the last one was in victory formation. BG had 17 red zone points on those 5 trips. One of those was the Keith run, which was from the 19. We struggle even more up close. We threw a pick in the red zone (Coach said he called the wrong play) and McDonald essentially threw another pick in the end zone that the guy didn't catch. We can't make short yardage and we missed a short FG. Our one legit short-yardage red zone score was an old end-around to Harold Fannin Jr.
Also, there were 4 dropped passes.
So, how was the offense the key to winning? Coming in. Miami was the #10 run defense in FBS. They allow 2.8 yards per carry. Far and away top in the MAC and they played a representative non-conference schedule. Meanwhile, BG struggled to run against UB's last-in-the-MAC run defense. My preview said that we would probably just switch to mostly passing, like we did against UB.
Lo and behold, BG ended up running the ball effectively. BG averaged 4 yards per carry--both the number above and the game number include sacks as rushes. Patterson and Johnson both averaged 5.2 yards per carry. Patterson had 94 on 18 carries, much of it on tough runs, breaking tackles and being hard to bring down.
It was our best run game since the UB game last year and our best run blocking game of the season (PFF).
How did this happen? Coach said we changed the running game up...we did a "bunch of things we haven't done all year long." He credited the coaches and team for making those changes in a game week. We mostly run gap plays, not zone plays. Patterson had 7 zone runs (out of our 10). We averaged 15 yards per attempt going off right guard. The other thing I noticed was that we seemed to run sweeps to the right more than normal. Maybe an Xs or Os guy can help flesh it out.
The jet sweep left was also very effective with a TD and another first down on 3 attempts.
The last thing was BG's ability to close the game.
4th Quarter, BG is up 17-13 and just took the lead, 11:31 to play. In past games, this has been a moment of maximum danger. Can we sustain success? At first, it looked sadly familiar. On 3rd and 9, Smith ran for 26 yards to the BG 48. BG gets a break from a delay of game penalty and then Smith is running on 3rd and 7 and BG stops him for 3 yards...enough to force Miami to punt.
BG ball on their own 10. This is 7:10 left to play. BG needs first downs. If they punt from here, Miami starts around midfield and we're in trouble. They got 2 first downs...Patterson for 13 and then Patterson for a net of 13 after a 45 yard run had a holding call upfield. BG is enforcing the running game at the end, just like real teams do. A sack finally ends the drive, but BG is on their own 34. Sir, with the wind, gets a 41 yard punt fair caught and Miami starts on the 25.
BG was bleeding clock on every plan. It went from 7:10 to 3:23. Still, Miami has two time outs and plenty of time. You only win the game with a stop.
How many times have we seen this go wrong?
Smith went running and we got him for three yards. Darren Anders broke up passes on 2nd and 3rd down. And then on 4th and 7, Smith went on a designed scramble and Haire and Hawkins came upfield and took him down 1 yard short.
The game is not over. BG starts on the Miami 34, with the wind. Still, there's already one missed FG in the rear view mirror. Miami has 2 time outs. BG needs a first down. How many times, I ask you, have we gone 3 and out in a situation like this? Or any team? Miami knows you are going to run. Patterson gets 5 on the first carry and 0 on 2nd down. Facing a third-down and 5, Patterson and most of the line went right and he powered his way past the marker for the first down. Now, the game is over.
So the third thing--making first downs and getting a stop in crunch time and being confident enough to bleed clock while you do it.
It was a highly satisfying win. I'm proud of our guys. The next test, as always, is to put a streak of good games together consistently. At 3-4, BG can still reach its goal...but we need at this point in the rebuild to demonstrate the ability to play well each week. I don't think that is an unrealistic expectation.
The late, great Bob Hitchens |
What is their body of work?
UCLA--(6-0) Beat #11 Utah 42-32
EKU--(3-2) The indomitable Colonels were idle
Marshall--(3-2) The "could win out" Herd were idle
Mississippi State--(5-1) Beat Arkansas
Akron--(1-5) Lost to OU
Buffalo--(3-3) We played them
Miami--(3-3) Beat Kent
CMU--(1-5) Lost to Ball State
WMU--(2-4) Lost to EMU in Kzoo
KSU--(2-4) Lost to Miami
UT--(4-2) Smoked NIU
OU--(3-3) Beat Akron
East Vs. West: East 1, West 0
MAC vs P5: 2-19
MAC vs. G5: 4-9
MAC vs FCS: 10-2
Woof. That quote was from Coach Loeffler. And he's right. It did. Gibby said it was among the worst games he had ever seen us play and I can't disagree and I have seen a bunch of them. So have you. But this was just the worst. Bad play piled on top of bad play. And this was a team that we were supposed to be equal with. And we are supposed to be competitive with teams in our conference and we simply are not. Key phrase is "something missing."
There was no one there to start with and even less by the end of the game. Here is what it looked like under the Doyt at halftime.
Coach Loeffler did not mince any words. There was no talk about UB being some kind of secretly great team. More to come, but here is what Coach had to say, and I'm not sure I could say it any more accurately.
On taking responsibility for today’s loss:
“In all three phases, to play as bad as they did, it starts with me. I’ll take responsibility for it.
We’re supposed to be competitive, and we were as far from competitive today as you can
possibly get.”
On the disappointment of today’s loss:
“We’re supposed to be competitive. That team right there that we just played was equivalent
to us, and we didn’t play well in all aspects. We need to figure it out, we need to get it fixed.
We’re playing a good Miami of Ohio team next week, but that was as disappointing a half and
disappointing a game that I’ve had probably in my career.”
On playing competitive football:
“I expected this would be a heck of a football game, and on paper it should have been. There’s
something missing that you can go and play as well as we’ve ever played around here in a long
time to playing as bad as you can play, and that’s the truth. The Marshall game, we played as
well as you can possibly play. You play that type of competitive football, you have a chance to
beat anyone in this league, but that was a debacle. . . we crushed ourselves, plain and simple.
We beat ourselves in every aspect.”
On emotions in the game of football:
“I thought preparation was as good as we’ve prepped. I did not like the emotion of our team on
our sidelines. They [Buffalo] had emotion, we didn’t, and I don’t understand that. That’s the
part of the puzzle that I don’t get. This is an emotional game, and obviously I’ve got to figure
out how to get their emotions going because that was not an emotional football game
whatsoever for us.”
On takeaways from today’s game:
“If you don’t take lessons from today, you’re out of your mind. We’ve got to get consistent. You
can’t play this up and down and be this up and down from week to week. We’ve got to find that
secret sauce. If you go out here and you play your ass off and you’re disciplined and you did all
the things you’re supposed to do and you lose, that’s one thing. . . but it looked like the past, to
What is their body of work?
Just a quick update....other than trying to oddly make this into a rivalry game, Coach didn't say anything newsworthy today. Also, nothing new on the depth chart, with the line the same as played nearly all the snaps on Saturday.
UCLA--(5-0) Beat a ranked UW team.
EKU--(3-2) The indomitable Colonels beat Southern Utah by 7
Marshall--(3-2) The "could win out" Herd beat Gardner-Webb 28-7
Mississippi State--(5-1) Wooof, crush Texas A&M
Akron--(1-4) We played them
Buffalo--(2-3) Surprising win over Miami in Buffalo
Miami--(2-3) Surprising loss @UB
CMU--(1-4) Lost handily to UT
WMU--(2-3) Beat New Hamphsire
KSU--(2-3) Gutted out win over
UT--(3-2) Beat CMU
OU--(2-3) Lost @ Kent
East Vs. West: East 1, West 0
MAC vs P5: 2-19
MAC vs. G5: 4-9
MAC vs FCS: 10-2
All victories at this point are sweet. As Coach said after the game, "it wasn't pretty," but it is a win in a conference where we are learning that more than ever anything can happen.
And I do believe that one of our previous teams gives up at least a FG on that last drive. Akron started from the 2--and they had made a similar drive already--and made progress, including a cringe-worthy 24-yard QB scramble on 3rd and 22. But the team did finish, got the ball on downs and then made a first down to kill the clock, something else we have struggled with recently.
So, yeah, not pretty. The only worse thing would be to lose. We had to have this game to have any shot of getting to 6 wins. Now, we have to go 4-3 from here on in. Did yesterday project to that? No, probably not. We won't play an Akron again. This team will have to be much better starting right away to get there.
BG won the game on the turnover battle. There's nothing wrong with that. BG takes good care of the ball and is +6 in turnovers this year. Furthermore, Akron made catastrophic turnovers, one on a pick-6 and one on a muffed punt inside their own 5 at the end of the first half. That's 14 of BG's 31 points right there.
There were a myriad of other mistakes on their side, dropped balls, ill-timed penalties, etc. Winning takes consistent quality plays and they just don't make them.
BG had a ton of issues: