When I did my pre-season preview, I thought this team had a ceiling of four wins. There was no way we were going to be a .500 team with the lack of development on the offensive line and we weren't and I think that is largely why.
After the OU game, I had a commenter note this:
"Last year it was 40-something to 0 at halftime. The people that think there hasn't been progress are nuts."
You can only make a diagnosis in a clinical setting, but I would agree they are 100% wrong. This team is better than the 2020 team, and I don't think it can be debated.
But, to be fair, 2020 was so bad that you almost had to improve.
The better question is whether we were improved enough to indicate we are on the path to being competitive on the timetable that Loeffler established, meaning being competitive next season.
This is a question that has divided our fan base. A coach with a 7-22 record is going to have detractors and Loeffler does, for sure. You can't be surprised or even blame them.
I don't agree, though. I wish we would have gotten a stronger signal from 2021--something that would have come from being more competitive in at least a couple of the games, say Akron, EMU and Miami...UT. But I think there is a path forward for us that you can see.
I guess I always think that the progress is going to be linear. You're going to get a little bit better each week and then by the end of 2021 you might be pretty good. But that's not how it's looking. BG was worse in the second half of the season than the first half. Commenters have pointed out that BG's young line might have gotten tired and ground down over the season, which led to the problems in the latter part of the season.
Which is entirely possible. The point is that there were positives to the 2021 season
- 4 wins
- Beat a Big 10 team
- Played Kent and NIU tough
And there were negatives:
- UT game
- Southern Alabama loss
- Akron Loss
- EMU loss
- Miami loss
(Yes, I know there were other losses, but these were all losses to teams that were around .500.)
The official line is that our problem is how young we are. The problem with that line is that NIU had a younger team than we did and they hoisted the trophy. What they did have was an experienced and effective transfer QB.
I also have a commenter who likes to track us against the Ball State road to the 2020 title.
In Neu's third year they were 4-8, 3-5. BG was 4-8, 2-6. So not far off.
They got one game better overall and in the MAC the next year and won the MAC the year after that.
So, we're on that track, to be sure. I think there is a path to being competitive.
So what has to happen?
BG has to be better up front, both sides of the ball.
The offensive line was so exposed that literally, they crashed the offense in a couple of the games. BG has to be able to run the ball and protect the QB. The Falcons have good RBs and WRs and the TEs are good and promising. (More on the QB later). But when your blocking is blown up on every play, you don't have a chance.
The good news is that we are now open to transfers. They made a huge difference on defense this year and I think they are going to be part of college football moving forward. We just have to adjust.
BG's returning players have to get bigger and stronger. Coach has said this...he also said it after 2020 and it apparently didn't happen. These guys have some hard knocks learning under their belt but they have to be more physical. We're not on the path to anything without it.
BG also needs to supplement the lines with some transfers. Internet traffic indicates that they are recruiting in these areas. A couple solid, experienced, big O-lineman and even one d-lineman to be in the rotation would make a big difference.
BG has to return contributing players
The portal can give, the portal can take away. BG needs its contributing players back. This is still in flux, but retaining the players who contributed--and now have a case to make at another school--is critical.
BG needs a QB who can pressure Matt McDonald
For the second straight year, we found out after the season was over that Matt McDonald was playing with a serious injury, this time a broken hand. As always, the QB receives a lot of criticism on a losing team. That's how it goes. First, the guy is clearly a warrior, playing through injuries over two seasons and being a tackling dummy for many of those games. You have to admire his grit.
He has shown some promise. He made some really nice throws against OU, with time to operate. He also tends to miss some throws, too.
The biggest issue is that I don't think he's a great QB and even with a broken hand we didn't have anyone better. He was last in the MAC in passing efficiency in 2020 and 2021. That has to be a concern. Whether it is a transfer or someone on the roster now, BG needs a QB who can push McDonald and be better than him when he is injured.
Perhaps the bigger worry is that I fear there might be a blind spot here. I don't see practice, maybe he is better than everyone else we have. Or maybe there's a blind spot. If so, that needs to get addressed. If you fix the line and then the QB is still below average, you aren't on the path to anything.
Special teams need to be upgraded quickly
Almost all the players with no returning eligibility are special teams players. BG won at least one game on the back of Nate Needham. There are three kickers on the returning roster--Mason Lawler who has been doing our kickoffs, Jack Sauder, from TN, and Alan Anaya, from Mexico. Anaya's brother is on the men's soccer team. If one of these guys is not the guy, we need to get a transfer.
Our all-MAC punter is also leaving. He was 8th this year in punting in the MAC and will need to be replaced. Both Lawler and Anaya are also listed as punters on the roster. There is also Jarrad Kerekes, an all-state player from the Cleveland area. Again, if one of these is not the guy, this is a chance to get a transfer.
Lastly, BG's return defense games need to be improved. BG was 9th in net kickoffs and 11th in net punting.
So, BG was better than 2020. You'd hope so. That's only useful if it is a step on the path, it doesn't stand on its own.
No comments:
Post a Comment