So we had the opportunity to do a blog swap with a Temple Blog, Buzz on Broad. You know how this works, I gave them 5 questions about Temple and they gave me 5 at BG. Here are the questions I asked and what I found to be their very enlightening answers.
1. When you look at Temple's season, you can't help but be surprised at the Toledo game. Since then, Temple has had two straight shut outs and scored 76 points. What happened in that Toledo game? Do you think it might be different in a MAC Title rematch?
The Toledo game was really a combination of a lot of factors that all snowballed into each other. Temple's game is built upon controlling the clock and holding onto the ball, while Toledo's is about speed and keeping the defense on its heels. When you play a high-tempo offense, your defense needs time to rest. Unfortunately, an early botched punt return--on a terrible punt that hit one of the gunners, not really a Temple mistake--led to a touchdown, as did an interception, and Temple's offense was forced out of their rhythm. If Temple fields that punt correctly, the entire game could have turned out differently, that's how much of a chain reaction that game was. I think in the title game, if Chester Stewart can avoid overthrowing his receivers by 10 feet like he did twice against the Rockets, then the Owls have a very good chance of beating the Rockets--that game was closer than the score indicated, just turnovers killed it for the Owls
2. Temple's defense is at historic levels. A MAC team has not held its opponents in single digit scoring since 1990. What impact has Chuck Heater had on the defense since arriving?
3. Temple's offensive philosophy is pretty clear. Talk about your two stud RBs...are their styles different or similar?
4. Saturday's game features two former OC's who were run out of the SEC by a dangerously unbalanced fan base. Talk about Coach Addazio. How has he built on what Al Golden started and how has he changed things?
5. Temple has been the only MAC school that has been involved in the conference realignment talk. Are you happy with Temple in the MAC for football and A-10 for basketball, or would you be happier in the Big East--whatever form that might take?
The Big East is clearly not the conference it was a few years ago, or even a few weeks ago, but it's still a better conference than the MAC. Are Rutgers and UConn really great names in football? Obviously not--but to fans and the media, they're still more impressive names than Ball State or Western Michigan. All of these moves are based around money, and the fact is that Temple stands to benefit financially much more from being in a BCS conference with all the media attention that comes with it. More nationally televised games, more fans in the seats, bigger contracts with the networks and thus more revenue sharing--Temple stands only to gain from moving up to the Big East. Basketball-wise, they would still be playing against (as of now) Louisville, Marquette, Georgetown, Villanova, St. John's, Connecticut and a few others, which are yet again better names than Richmond, Fordham, and some of the other teams in the Atlantic 10. The Big East is definitely on shaky ground, but if a seismic shift does occur, Temple needs to do whatever they can to end up in a good position and stay in a major conference.Click here to see how I answered the questions from the Philly boys.
No comments:
Post a Comment