There's a sub text here, and I think you know what it is....everyone is fixating on the collapse in Knoxville and the "difficulty" that the vols had adjusting to the new Clawson attack. A few thoughts on that:
I don't know what kind of offense he was supposedly implementing, but I can't imagine it was THAT complicated.
- Could there possibly have been some other things in play at Tennessee for which Clawson is taking the fall?
- Is the Clawson attack only able to operate at schools full of rocket scientists like Fordham and Richmond?
I don't know. Maybe the thing in Tennessee was all his fault. I have my doubts. The coach was obviously gone mid-way through the season. Isn't it also possible that the guys quit on him and Fulmer?
Here's another way to look at it. Let's say that a complicated offense WAS a contributing factor at Tennessee. Do you think that Coach Clawson will try that exact thing, without modification, again? I have to believe he is smarter than that.
As a secondary point, they point to problems he had in his first seasons at Fordham and Richmond as further evidence that whatever he's cooking up, a person just can't grasp it right away.
We'll see. This team obviously lost a lot of starters, but the players who were back were not performing as they should have been. I have lots more preview to do, but I did want to note this "conventional wisdom" that is emerging.
No comments:
Post a Comment