MAC | |||||
Team | Record | ||||
9-4 | @OU, @Kent, Miami | ||||
9-4 | BG, OU, @Kent | ||||
9-4 | @Akron, @Miami, OU | ||||
8-5 | @Miami, Buffalo, Akron | ||||
8-5 | Kent, BG, @Buffalo | ||||
7-6 | Buffalo, @Akron, @Kent | ||||
7-6 | @NIU, @WMU, EMU | ||||
6-7 | @UT, Ball, CMU | ||||
5-8 | EMU, UT, @WMU | ||||
4-9 | Ball, @EMU, @UT | ||||
3-10 | WMU, @CMU, NIU | ||||
3-10 | @CMU, NIU, @Ball |
MAC Tiebreaker
1. Head-to-head competition
2. Winning percentage* vs. ranked conference teams (top to bottom, regardless of division; versus common opponents, regardless of the number of times played)
3. Coin flip
* Winning percentage is used instead of record because of situations where teams do not play each other the same number of times. Therefore, a team that is 1-0 (1.000) would win the tiebreaker over a team that is 1-1 (.500).
BG Head to Head Status:
We win tiebreakers with:
Buffalo
Western
Ball State
UT
NIU
CMU
We lose tiebreakers to:
EMU
Draw
Kent
Tiebreakers in Flux:
Akron (A BG Win makes it a tie)
Ohio (A BG win gives us this tiebreaker)
Miami (A BG win makes it a tie)
Finally, based on #2, as long as Buffalo eventually finishes in first place, this is very good for us, since we swept them.
No comments:
Post a Comment